website statistics Dark Age Naval Power. a Reassessment of Frankish and Anglo-Saxon Seafaring Activity - PDF Books Online
Hot Best Seller

Dark Age Naval Power. a Reassessment of Frankish and Anglo-Saxon Seafaring Activity

Availability: Ready to download

This is a revised study of life on the sea in the dark ages. The evidence in this edition supports Haywood's earlier arguments, and advances the view that Viking ships and sea borne activities were not as revolutionary as is commonly believed. This is a revised study of life on the sea in the dark ages. The evidence in this edition supports Haywood's earlier arguments, and advances the view that Viking ships and sea borne activities were not as revolutionary as is commonly believed.


Compare

This is a revised study of life on the sea in the dark ages. The evidence in this edition supports Haywood's earlier arguments, and advances the view that Viking ships and sea borne activities were not as revolutionary as is commonly believed. This is a revised study of life on the sea in the dark ages. The evidence in this edition supports Haywood's earlier arguments, and advances the view that Viking ships and sea borne activities were not as revolutionary as is commonly believed.

36 review for Dark Age Naval Power. a Reassessment of Frankish and Anglo-Saxon Seafaring Activity

  1. 5 out of 5

    Edoardo Albert

    John Haywood convincingly argues that the Franks and Anglo-Saxons were far more accomplished seafarers than they are generally given credit for. In particular, Anglo-Saxon craft were almost certainly masted and, based on a half-size sailing replica of the Sutton Hoo boat, fine, seaworthy craft, perfectly adapted to crossing the North Sea and sailing deep up the estuaries and rivers feeding the sea. In fact, they were much like the Vikings, before the Vikings! I've taken one star off because the John Haywood convincingly argues that the Franks and Anglo-Saxons were far more accomplished seafarers than they are generally given credit for. In particular, Anglo-Saxon craft were almost certainly masted and, based on a half-size sailing replica of the Sutton Hoo boat, fine, seaworthy craft, perfectly adapted to crossing the North Sea and sailing deep up the estuaries and rivers feeding the sea. In fact, they were much like the Vikings, before the Vikings! I've taken one star off because the book, although beautifully produced with many interesting illustrations, has an irritating number of textual and layout errors, from blocks of text being centred rather than filling a column, to too many words elided. Publisher: pay for a proofreader!

  2. 5 out of 5

    Peter Fox

    Dark Age Naval Power – a reassessment of Frankish and Anglo-Saxon Seafaring Activity, by John Haywood, 1999, 187 pages This is a work about Frankish and Anglo-Saxon seafaring, published by Anglo-Saxon Books, yet the Anglo-Saxons don't feature as prominently in it as you may have hoped. The first 77 pages are about early Germanic seafaring, which does provide a background, but I'd not really class the Roman period as being dark age. Chapter 3 (33 pages) is where the Anglo-Saxons come into it prope Dark Age Naval Power – a reassessment of Frankish and Anglo-Saxon Seafaring Activity, by John Haywood, 1999, 187 pages This is a work about Frankish and Anglo-Saxon seafaring, published by Anglo-Saxon Books, yet the Anglo-Saxons don't feature as prominently in it as you may have hoped. The first 77 pages are about early Germanic seafaring, which does provide a background, but I'd not really class the Roman period as being dark age. Chapter 3 (33 pages) is where the Anglo-Saxons come into it properly and this concerns the Saxon Shore (4 pgs), from raiding to settlement (12 pgs), their ships (17 pgs) and then up to the Viking Age (3 pgs). The remaining 76 pages are all about the Franks and their naval affairs. As you can see from this breakdown, you don't really get a lot about Anglo-Saxon seafaring in here. This doesn't make it a bad book, but it does make it feel a bit limited in this aspect and I'm not convinced that I'd have paid £14.95 if I'd known the allocation of contents prior to purchase. Haywood knows his stuff. When it comes to boats and seafaring he's very good. He makes a very worthy point about how Germanic seafaring has been squeezed out by the Vikings grabbing most of the attention and this book redresses the balance. He demonstrates that there was always a seafaring aspect to the Germans and how this continued from the Roman period all the way through to the end of the book. He dispels any idea that the Anglo-Saxons didn't use sails and makes a strong case for the Franks being a significant naval power. In fact the chapter on Charlemagne is easily the strongest in the book. In particular the section on the Rhine-Danube (Regnitz-Altmuhl) Canal is very interesting. This failed project is sometimes used as a comparison between the civil engineering accomplishments of Offa and Charlemagne. However, Haywood shows that the two aren't like for like. Whilst both required lots of spade work, the canal had insuperable geological problems (quick sand and a difference in water levels) and the strategic purpose passed before it had progressed very far. So comments in books lauding Offa's much longer dyke and criticising Charlemagne's relatively short canal aren't justified. There are a lot of footnotes (with original sources and translations) in this work and they would be of great use to anyone wishing to go further with their study. This book only looks at piracy and warfare, barring a short study concerning possible migration methods. There are sections about ship construction for each era and these are pretty thorough, but not particularly exciting for the lay reader, unless you have a yearning to know about thwarts, strakes and so on. The naval aspects of Hygelac's raid are looked into, but if you are wanting to learn much about Anglo-Saxon naval affairs, then there's not much to get your teeth into. For example, when it comes to Edwin and Ecgfrith's naval activities in the Irish Sea, you won't get much further than you would just reading the relevant passages in Bede. This is a book that I enjoyed reading, although much of it is tangential to my interests in Anglo-Saxon England.

  3. 4 out of 5

    S.J. Arnott

    This book sets out to examine the long held assumption that the Anglo-Saxons built rather flimsy ships that could not support a sail, and had to take to sea in what were essentially large rowing boats. This always struck me as a peculiar outlook given that sailing technology is very old, not particularly complicated, and has very obvious advantages over muscle power. In addition, the Angles and the Saxons were in close contact with other sea-going cultures (such as the Romans) that used sail as a This book sets out to examine the long held assumption that the Anglo-Saxons built rather flimsy ships that could not support a sail, and had to take to sea in what were essentially large rowing boats. This always struck me as a peculiar outlook given that sailing technology is very old, not particularly complicated, and has very obvious advantages over muscle power. In addition, the Angles and the Saxons were in close contact with other sea-going cultures (such as the Romans) that used sail as a matter of routine. John Haywood looks at the origins of the rowboat theory and why it persisted. He then does an excellent job of presenting evidence for an opposing view: ie that the Angles, Saxons, Franks and Frisians (and other tribes from the Baltic area and German coast) are likely to have been accomplished seamen. In fact the pattern and scope of their raiding activities appear to have been very similar to that of the Vikings that followed them. This view has important implications for many aspects of Anglo-Saxon research, in particular the Germanic Migration period. John Haywood offers compelling and well reasoned arguments, but is careful to point out the relative strengths and weaknesses of his case. The work is well written, very readable and impeccably referenced. Two minor niggles. Firstly, the reproduction of some of the illustrations is not great, but this might have been beyond the publisher's control. Secondly, there are a number of quotes and extracts in Latin with no accompanying translation. I appreciate the original text being provided, but would have found it useful to have an Annex that included the same text in English. An excellent book that is a must read for anyone interested in Anglo-Saxon and Frankish history.

  4. 4 out of 5

    Awk78

  5. 5 out of 5

    Notquitekarpov

  6. 4 out of 5

    John Springer

  7. 5 out of 5

    Stephen Arnott

  8. 5 out of 5

    Francis Hagan

  9. 4 out of 5

    Willow Croft

  10. 4 out of 5

    Steve Bivans

  11. 4 out of 5

    Alice Hicklin

  12. 4 out of 5

    Thom Dunn

  13. 4 out of 5

    Duane

  14. 4 out of 5

    C May

  15. 5 out of 5

    Paul

  16. 5 out of 5

    Edward

  17. 4 out of 5

    Kevin

  18. 5 out of 5

    Ayman Fadel

  19. 5 out of 5

    Leofwine Freyasdottir

  20. 4 out of 5

    Bill

  21. 5 out of 5

    Diana

  22. 4 out of 5

    Elizabeth Cole

  23. 5 out of 5

    Wikimedia Italia

  24. 5 out of 5

    Lisa

  25. 4 out of 5

    Robert Crowell

  26. 5 out of 5

    Marcel Philippe

  27. 4 out of 5

    Myles

  28. 4 out of 5

    Martin Wilebore

  29. 4 out of 5

    Eadweard

  30. 5 out of 5

    Schlurpi

  31. 5 out of 5

    Brannigan

  32. 4 out of 5

    Scott Keith

  33. 4 out of 5

    Hilary

  34. 4 out of 5

    Francisco Martorell

  35. 4 out of 5

    Paul Basar

  36. 5 out of 5

    Neverdust

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading...