website statistics Who's Counting?: How Fraudsters and Bureaucrats Put Your Vote at Risk - PDF Books Online
Hot Best Seller

Who's Counting?: How Fraudsters and Bureaucrats Put Your Vote at Risk

Availability: Ready to download

The 2012 election will be one of the hardest-fought in U.S. history. It is also likely to be one of the closest, a fact that brings concerns about voter fraud and bureaucratic incompetence in the conduct of elections front and center. If we don't take notice, we could see another debacle like the Bush-Gore Florida recount of 2000 in which courts and lawyers intervened in w The 2012 election will be one of the hardest-fought in U.S. history. It is also likely to be one of the closest, a fact that brings concerns about voter fraud and bureaucratic incompetence in the conduct of elections front and center. If we don't take notice, we could see another debacle like the Bush-Gore Florida recount of 2000 in which courts and lawyers intervened in what should have involved only voters. Who's Counting? will focus attention on many problems of our election system, ranging from voter fraud to a slipshod system of vote counting that noted political scientist Walter Dean Burnham calls �the most careless of the developed world.” In an effort to clean up our election laws, reduce fraud and increase public confidence in the integrity of the voting system, many states ranging from Georgia to Wisconsin have passed laws requiring a photo ID be shown at the polls and curbing the rampant use of absentee ballots, a tool of choice by fraudsters. The response from Obama allies has been to belittle the need for such laws and attack them as akin to the second coming of a racist tide in American life. In the summer of 2011, both Bill Clinton and DNC chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz preposterously claimed that such laws suppressed minority voters and represented a return to the era of Jim Crow. But voter fraud is a well-documented reality in American elections. Just this year, a sheriff and county clerk in West Virginia pleaded guilty to stuffing ballot boxes with fraudulent absentee ballots that changed the outcome of an election. In 2005, a state senate election in Tennessee was overturned because of voter fraud. The margin of victory? 13 votes. In 2008, the Minnesota senate race that provided the 60th vote needed to pass Obamacare was decided by a little over 300 votes. Almost 200 felons have already been convicted of voting illegally in that election and dozens of other prosecutions are still pending. Public confidence in the integrity of elections is at an all-time low. In the Cooperative Congressional Election Study of 2008, 62% of American voters thought that voter fraud was very common or somewhat common. Fear that elections are being stolen erodes the legitimacy of our government. That's why the vast majority of Americans support laws like Kansas's Secure and Fair Elections Act. A 2010 Rasmussen poll showed that 82% of Americans support photo ID laws. While Americans frequently demand observers and best practices in the elections of other countries, we are often blind to the need to scrutinize our own elections. We may pay the consequences in 2012 if a close election leads us into pitched partisan battles and court fights that will dwarf the Bush-Gore recount wars.


Compare

The 2012 election will be one of the hardest-fought in U.S. history. It is also likely to be one of the closest, a fact that brings concerns about voter fraud and bureaucratic incompetence in the conduct of elections front and center. If we don't take notice, we could see another debacle like the Bush-Gore Florida recount of 2000 in which courts and lawyers intervened in w The 2012 election will be one of the hardest-fought in U.S. history. It is also likely to be one of the closest, a fact that brings concerns about voter fraud and bureaucratic incompetence in the conduct of elections front and center. If we don't take notice, we could see another debacle like the Bush-Gore Florida recount of 2000 in which courts and lawyers intervened in what should have involved only voters. Who's Counting? will focus attention on many problems of our election system, ranging from voter fraud to a slipshod system of vote counting that noted political scientist Walter Dean Burnham calls �the most careless of the developed world.” In an effort to clean up our election laws, reduce fraud and increase public confidence in the integrity of the voting system, many states ranging from Georgia to Wisconsin have passed laws requiring a photo ID be shown at the polls and curbing the rampant use of absentee ballots, a tool of choice by fraudsters. The response from Obama allies has been to belittle the need for such laws and attack them as akin to the second coming of a racist tide in American life. In the summer of 2011, both Bill Clinton and DNC chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz preposterously claimed that such laws suppressed minority voters and represented a return to the era of Jim Crow. But voter fraud is a well-documented reality in American elections. Just this year, a sheriff and county clerk in West Virginia pleaded guilty to stuffing ballot boxes with fraudulent absentee ballots that changed the outcome of an election. In 2005, a state senate election in Tennessee was overturned because of voter fraud. The margin of victory? 13 votes. In 2008, the Minnesota senate race that provided the 60th vote needed to pass Obamacare was decided by a little over 300 votes. Almost 200 felons have already been convicted of voting illegally in that election and dozens of other prosecutions are still pending. Public confidence in the integrity of elections is at an all-time low. In the Cooperative Congressional Election Study of 2008, 62% of American voters thought that voter fraud was very common or somewhat common. Fear that elections are being stolen erodes the legitimacy of our government. That's why the vast majority of Americans support laws like Kansas's Secure and Fair Elections Act. A 2010 Rasmussen poll showed that 82% of Americans support photo ID laws. While Americans frequently demand observers and best practices in the elections of other countries, we are often blind to the need to scrutinize our own elections. We may pay the consequences in 2012 if a close election leads us into pitched partisan battles and court fights that will dwarf the Bush-Gore recount wars.

30 review for Who's Counting?: How Fraudsters and Bureaucrats Put Your Vote at Risk

  1. 4 out of 5

    Jon

    (As I post this review from 2014, it seems more topical today for some reason) I found a reference in James O'Keefe's book to Fund and Spakovsky's book on voter fraud. My initial impression from O'Keefe is that it's pretty rare, based on the number of stings he performed, but Who's Counting shows just how widespread voter fraud really is in this country. I'm going to quote extensively from the book, as there is example after example of the problems in our system here; I can only give you a taste. (As I post this review from 2014, it seems more topical today for some reason) I found a reference in James O'Keefe's book to Fund and Spakovsky's book on voter fraud. My initial impression from O'Keefe is that it's pretty rare, based on the number of stings he performed, but Who's Counting shows just how widespread voter fraud really is in this country. I'm going to quote extensively from the book, as there is example after example of the problems in our system here; I can only give you a taste. "The real myth in this debate is not the existence of voter fraud, which exists; the real myth is the claim that voters are disenfranchised because of voter ID requirements." In 2009 "...ACORN had hired 59 inmates from a nearby prison work-release program to collect registrations. Several who had been convicted of identity theft were made ACORN supervisors: the group was hiring specialists to do its work." "...former Alabama congressman Arthur Davis, a Democrat turned independent who says he regrets having opposed laws cracking down on voter fraud even though he knew it occurred in his district; as a reformer challenging an entrenched machine, he had to calculate ho many phony votes he would have to overcome to win." "The Department of Justice prosecuted its larges voter fraud case ever in Chicago - prosecutors estimated that 100,000 fraudulent ballots were cast in the 1982 gubernatorial election." "Chris Matthews...explained the scheme: Someone calls to enquire whether you voted or are going to vote, and 'then all of a sudden somebody does come and vote for you.' Matthews says this is an old strategy in big-city politics 'I know all about it in North Philly - it's what went on, and I believe it still goes on.'" Does Matthews now support voter ID laws? I suspect not. "Another method entailed collecting, during nominating petition drives, the names of registered voters who had died or moved - deadwood voters. Crews were hen sent to vote under those names." During a city council election in 2007 in Hoboken, NJ, a group of imposters were caught. "The imposter admitted to the police that the group was from a local homeless shelter and each person had been paid $10 to vote using other people's names." "...the North Carolina Board of Elections admitted that it had caught at least a dozen people trying to vote in more than one location, and election officials acknowledged that 'it would be hard to catch anyone who intentionally double-voted across state lines, because states don't share their voter databases.'" Noncitizens are on voter registration lists all over the country. "Up to three percent of the 30,000 individuals called up for jury duty from voter registration rolls over a two-year period in just one U.S. district court were not citizens. While that may not seem like many, just three percent of registered voters would have been more than enough to provide the winning presidential vote margin in Florida in 2000." During a 1997 investigation into voting by noncitizens: "...the INS refused to cooperate with the criminal investigation. An INS official was quoted as saying, '...if word got out that this is a substantial problem, it could tie up all sorts of manpower.'" "Why would an illegal alien register to vote?...the federal I-9 form that employers must complete for new employees provides a list of documentation that can be used to establish identity - including a voter ID card." Two to three thousand individuals summoned for jury duty in Orange County in 1998 claimed an exemption from jury duty because they were not citizens. 85 to 90 percent of those individuals were summoned from the voter registration list, rather than DMV records. In a case of voter fraud in Greene County, Alabama in 1994 being investigated by the Justice Department and the FBI, the NAACP sided with the conspirators, provided their defense funds, instead of siding with the black voters whose voting rights were being thwarted - mostly because the leadership of the NAACP were friends with some of the fraudsters. Unfortunately, there's a revolving door of sorts at the Justice Department, similar to the revolving door between the U.S. Congress, its staff, and the lobbying firms who buy their influence. The Justice Department is mostly staffed by lawyers who have worked for the ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center and others who have a belief in "racial payback". Acting Assistant Attorney General of Civil Rights, Loretta King, told staffers in the Voting section how excited she was that "We now have two black men running the country." If a white man made that sort of comment, you can imagine the uproar from the media, but all we hear of this is crickets chirping. Fund discusses the movement to change from the current electoral college system to a National Popular Vote, and analyzes the problems with this idea, as well as the reason behind the necessity of the electoral college established by the Constitution. He exposes the causes of low voter turnout by our military families, and the shameful way that many states have ignored the laws passed by Congress to make sure that their votes can be counted. In conclusion, Fund outlines a number of steps that we can take to limit voter fraud, including requiring voter ID, making sure all voters are U.S. citizens, preventing absentee ballot fraud, making sure voter registration databases contain valid data, compacts between the states to make sure people don't cast votes in multiple states (the problem is huge between New York and Florida - site of the disputed 2000 election, by the way), fixing the same-day registration and provisional ballot regulations, making sure our troops get their ballots in time to vote and return them before election day, and getting involved in our communities as election workers, a position filled now mostly by a vanishing corps of patriotic seniors.

  2. 4 out of 5

    Nathan Albright

    This was not a pleasant book to read, but it is the sort of important book to read that demonstrates a great deal of the corruption within the American political system.  Through by no means absolving the Republicans of their own efforts at gaming the system, this book really focuses on the way that Democrats have systematically threatened and undermined the legitimacy of the American Republic through a variety of types of voter fraud that has been supported through dog whistling and making fall This was not a pleasant book to read, but it is the sort of important book to read that demonstrates a great deal of the corruption within the American political system.  Through by no means absolving the Republicans of their own efforts at gaming the system, this book really focuses on the way that Democrats have systematically threatened and undermined the legitimacy of the American Republic through a variety of types of voter fraud that has been supported through dog whistling and making fallacious accusations of racism among those who would wish to stop it.  This book goes into considerable detail about how such fraud is conducted, why it is that the American Republic is so vulnerable to it, and how it is that efforts to remedy this fraud are fought every step of the way by political figures and bureaucrats who are either deluded are deeply involved in such corruption themselves who do not wish their own positions to be threatened through the enforcement of reasonable standards of justice to ensure the integrity of the voting process, all of which makes for painful but worthwhile reading. In thirteen chapters that take up about 250 pages or so, the authors manage to discuss some dark corners of the United States and the behavior of Obama and Clinton's corrupt Justice Departments that few people are likely aware of.  The authors begin with the crisis of voting confidence that exists within the United States (1) over concerns about the legitimacy of elections.  After that the authors discuss the curious blindness that many Democratic politicians have about the reality of voter fraud in light of the widespread cynicism about the legitimacy of elections (2).  Then there is a discussion about the battle over ID requirements and the myth of the disenfranchised voter (3).  The author then looks at the way that Democrats shoot the messengers who give them news they don't want to hear (4), the problem of noncitizen voting (5), and the abuses of absentee ballots (6) by vote thieves.  The authors take Holder's justice department to task (7), look at two-step voter fraud in Tennessee (8), discuss the fraud behind the hostility to the electoral college (9), give a brutal discussion of how a machine steals an entire Mississippi town (10), and discusses the reality of voter fraud as a cinematic experience (11).  The authors then close with a discussion of America's troops as the real disenfranchised voters (12) as well as offer some suggestions of what is to be done (13). This book is written by two people who happen to know a lot about voter fraud, one of them from his work in the Justice department and the other as a reporter for the Wall Street Journal.  The authors at least attempt to be nonpartisan, despite the fact that voter fraud leans heavily in the direction of the Democrats as it has been practiced traditionally and at present in the United States.  The authors look at the complex series of factors that is involved in voter fraud including the insane level of importance that Democrats place on holding power in government because of their lack of interest and skill in the private sector, and the greater vulnerability of the poor as opposed to the middle class to appeals of money and food in exchange for votes for a particular slate of "Progressive" politicians.  The book is damning, and one that should be required reading in any civics course that wishes to explore the legitimacy of the American republic, and that is certainly a book that will give a picture about some of the dark forces that motivate our current political crisis.

  3. 4 out of 5

    Dann Todd

    This was a frustrating book for me to read. Voter fraud is an issue that attracts my attention. Everyone should have the right to vote....once. The first half of the book is a compendium of voter fraud tactics that are used by Democrats AND Republicans routinely use to skew election results. Due to my past attention to this issue, there was little new material in the first half of the book. One new tidbit came out of Florida where there are naturalized citizens who immigrated from Cuba running This was a frustrating book for me to read. Voter fraud is an issue that attracts my attention. Everyone should have the right to vote....once. The first half of the book is a compendium of voter fraud tactics that are used by Democrats AND Republicans routinely use to skew election results. Due to my past attention to this issue, there was little new material in the first half of the book. One new tidbit came out of Florida where there are naturalized citizens who immigrated from Cuba running absentee voter fraud rings in areas with lots of senior citizens. Their activities are for the benefit of local/state Republican candidates. Given that they were active in 2000, I think it is legitimate to wonder how much their activities influenced the 2000 Presidential election. (I still think that GW Bush was a better candidate and President than Al Gore regardless of the debate over elections issues.) And then I hit the wall roughly half way through. The theme of the book went from documenting voter fraud to strictly criticizing the Obama administration over the inaction of the various agencies to prosecute people that have violated federal elections laws. A chapter or two about that lack of legal action would have been sufficient. However, the back half of the book makes it much harder to recommend this book to those that are left of center. When we need every political persuasion to participate in securing our elections, how can I recommend a book that so strongly disparages the left? That is essentially the back 1/3 to 1/2 of this book. This dichotomy was so strong that I had to put this book down for several months. Read it for the first half. That part of the book is worth 5 stars.

  4. 4 out of 5

    Joe

    Facts like millions on the voter rolls of all states who are dead and motor voter laws along with absentee balloting this book if accurate is so scary it is beyond belief. The elections we are being told are fare and flawless are shams. Chapters include: The Battle over voter ID and the myth that it intimidates people The chapter on Absentee voters is unreal that we would allow such a loophole. The most striking chapter though is the one on Holder's Justice department. His case with the New Black Pan Facts like millions on the voter rolls of all states who are dead and motor voter laws along with absentee balloting this book if accurate is so scary it is beyond belief. The elections we are being told are fare and flawless are shams. Chapters include: The Battle over voter ID and the myth that it intimidates people The chapter on Absentee voters is unreal that we would allow such a loophole. The most striking chapter though is the one on Holder's Justice department. His case with the New Black Panther Party and dismissal of it after it was won was a grouse injustice and ended the careers of folks who prosecuted it.

  5. 4 out of 5

    Rhonda Sue

    Excellent book on voter fraud and the Justice Dept, and Civil Rights Division bureaucrats and liberal bias. A must read if you're in the elections field. This book reveals some truly horrific things about the voting process in our country. Is there voter fraud? Read the book and you'll have a clue. Excellent book on voter fraud and the Justice Dept, and Civil Rights Division bureaucrats and liberal bias. A must read if you're in the elections field. This book reveals some truly horrific things about the voting process in our country. Is there voter fraud? Read the book and you'll have a clue.

  6. 5 out of 5

    Wendy Stotts

    This book should be read by every citizen. What is detailed in the book is simply shocking. Vote fraud is not an anomaly, it is endemic. That Mexico has a more secure election system than we have is shameful. We should easily be able to develop electronic systems to track and solve this problem.

  7. 5 out of 5

    Andy May

    Certainly eye-opening. Since the Russians may have meddled in our last election, this is even more important. I think tightening security at elections, paper backup to voting machines and more strict voter id is more important now than ever.

  8. 5 out of 5

    Shiloah

    The extent of voter fraud is appalling and discouraging. I appreciated the insights he included in the end on how to end this madness.

  9. 4 out of 5

    Winnifred

    I knew there was voting fraud, but until I read this I never knew how easy it was to accomplish. It is shocking how rampant it is.

  10. 4 out of 5

    Tina Krogdahl

    This book is a must-read for anyone who cares about the integrity of American elections. Well-written and informative.

  11. 5 out of 5

    Dave Jones

  12. 5 out of 5

    Chad Sly

  13. 5 out of 5

    Eric Gorse

  14. 5 out of 5

    Kevin DuJan

  15. 4 out of 5

    Biafra

  16. 4 out of 5

    Marc

  17. 4 out of 5

    Nathan Zatolokin

  18. 5 out of 5

    Mickey D. Barnett

  19. 4 out of 5

    Brent R. Herring

  20. 4 out of 5

    Rob

  21. 4 out of 5

    Nathan

  22. 4 out of 5

    Ashby

  23. 4 out of 5

    Kyle

  24. 4 out of 5

    Mtr_ambrose

  25. 4 out of 5

    John

  26. 5 out of 5

    Leonardo Pereira

  27. 5 out of 5

    Trevor Burrus

  28. 5 out of 5

    Trey

  29. 4 out of 5

    Tim Heise

  30. 4 out of 5

    Suzanne

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading...